<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Side</title>
	<atom:link href="http://doc-myside.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://doc-myside.com</link>
	<description>The Last Word On Hot Topics Of The Day</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:30:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Year Anniversary of the Attack on America</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/ten-year-anniversary-of-the-attack-on-america/2011/09/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/ten-year-anniversary-of-the-attack-on-america/2011/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s been 10 years since Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorists launched the first-ever attack on American soil when they hijacked four planes and flew them into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers in New York; The Pentagon in Washington, DC; and crashed one in a remote field in Pennsylvania after the passengers banned together [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been 10 years since Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda terrorists launched the first-ever attack on American soil when they hijacked four planes and flew them into the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers in New York; The Pentagon in Washington, DC; and crashed one in a remote field in Pennsylvania after the passengers banned together to foil their plan for another direct hit.  All total, 2,977 victims died in attacks that day (<em>2,606 in the World Trade Center, 125 in the Pentagon – including 55 military, and 246 aboard the four planes – not including the hijackers</em>).  </p>
<p>Those are the basic facts.  The attack on America that day caught the Nation by surprise.  We were unprepared – actually even complacent – thinking it could never happen on our turf.  Needless to say, it woke us all up.  </p>
<p>Ten years later, we continue to make a big deal on the anniversary of that horrible day.  Why?!? &#8211; I am not sure.  Signs, bumper stickers, coins, T-shirts, and other items proclaim:  <strong>“We Will Never Forget”.  </strong>How appropriate!  We <em>should</em> never forget and in reality, I am not sure if anyone in America over the age of 5 <em>could</em> ever forget what happened that day.  We do not need annual reminders to keep it fresh in our minds.  It is NOT something to celebrate – and each year we commemorate the day with highly visible events around the country (especially in DC and NY) – and in essence, we continue to give press and publicity to Al Qaeda and other would-be terrorists.</p>
<p>In addition, we continue to hail all of the victims of that tragic day as heroes.  I strongly disagree!  Those 2977 people, including the 55 military personnel, were ALL victims.  However, among the victims, were a few heroes.  The 411 emergency workers that died (firefighters and policemen) were indeed heroes!  They were fighting to rescue/save others.  In addition, the 40 passengers aboard United Flight 93 were all heroes – they fought against the hijackers and prevented another direct hit on a site in Washington – although they knew they were all going to die.  Therefore, aside from those 451 heroes, the others were just victims.  They were doing their jobs (in offices) or traveling unsuspectingly, and became victims against their will; much like the 10 victims of the DC Snipers in 2002 (<em>John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo</em>).  None of those victims were hailed as heroes – no memorials in their honor – no annual observances.  I am not suggesting that the memorials are not worthy but we tend to overdo it.  It’s as if the country feels guilty for being unprepared so we try to appease everyone by making it a big deal and hailing the victims as special heroes.  On Saturday, 9/10/11, a Flight 93 National Memorial will be dedicated and that one is well-deserved in honor of those victims and heroes.  However, the point here is that each year since the attacks, we remind the surviving members of the victims’ families of what happened.  We force them (and the rest of us) to re-live the events of that fateful day.  There were some former colleagues of mine that I respected and cared about who were killed on 9/11.  It is sad indeed, but even they were just innocent victims.  We all remember – we will always remember – but we don’t need the constant commemorations to keep 9/11/01 alive.  This is one writer’s position.  It won’t change anything.  On 9/11/11, the planned events will go on – and again next year, and the year afterwards, and so on.  Li and I will go about business as usual – attending the Redskins’ opening game (against the Giants – no coincidence here).  Perhaps someday, we can all just stop talking about 9/11 each year and leave it for the history books.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s MY SIDE.  Thanks for reading and sharing.  I welcome your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/ten-year-anniversary-of-the-attack-on-america/2011/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Will Triumph &#8212; So Will America (By Frank Schaefer &#8211; NY Times)</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/obama-will-triumph-so-will-america-by-frank-schaefer-ny-times/2011/09/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/obama-will-triumph-so-will-america-by-frank-schaefer-ny-times/2011/09/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is an interesting commentary written by Frank Schaefer of the NY Times. It was written a while back but the context is so relevant and really puts things in perspective. It was sent to me by someone that I respect and revere &#8211; someone who has never forwarded anything of this sort in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is an interesting commentary written by Frank Schaefer of the NY Times.  It was written a while back but the context is so relevant and really puts things in perspective.  It was sent to me by someone that I respect and revere &#8211; someone who has never forwarded anything of this sort in the past.  It made me bypass my scheduled commentary to post this on my site.  The President&#8217;s critics will probably not take the time to read this but I believe any intelligent individual with a desire to be &#8220;informed&#8221; will read and listen to commentary from all sides.  It helps to weed out fact from fiction.  The writer of the piece below is admittedly a typical White male that would not normally support President Obama &#8211; but yet, he looked beyond his past and saw reality.  It&#8217;s worth a read.  I urge you to share it and I welcome your feedback&#8230;.Doc<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Before he&#8217;d served even one year President Obama lost the support of the easily distracted left and engendered the white hot rage of the hate-filled right. But some of us, from all walks of life and ideological backgrounds &#8212; including this white, straight, 57-year- old, former religious right wing agitator, now progressive writer and (given my background as the son of a famous evangelical leader) this unlikely Obama supporter &#8212; are sticking with our President.<br />
Why?&#8211; because he is succeeding.</p>
<p>We faithful Obama supporters still trust our initial impression of him as a great, good and uniquely qualified man to lead us.  Obama&#8217;s steady supporters will be proved right. Obama&#8217;s critics will be remembered as easily panicked and prematurely discouraged at best and shriveled hate mongers at worst.</p>
<p>The Context of the Obama Presidency:  Not since the days of the rise of fascism in Europe, the Second World War and the Depression has any president faced more adversity. Not since the Civil War has any president led a more bitterly divided country. Not since the introduction of racial integration has any president faced a more consistently short-sighted and willfully ignorant opposition &#8211; from both the right and left.</p>
<p>As the President&#8217;s poll numbers have fallen so has his support from some on the left that were hailing him as a Messiah not long ago; all those lefty website&#8217;s and commentators that were falling all over themselves on behalf of our first black president during the 2008 election.  The left&#8217;s lack of faith has become a self-fulfilling &#8220;prophecy&#8221;&#8211; snipe at the President and then watch the poll numbers fall and then pretend you didn&#8217;t have anything to do with it!</p>
<p>Here is what Obama faced when he took office&#8211; none of which was his fault:<br />
# An ideologically divided country to the point that America was really two countries<br />
# Two wars; one that was mishandled from the start, the other that was unnecessary and immoral<br />
# The worst economic crisis since the depression<br />
# America&#8217;s standing in the world at the lowest point in history<br />
# A country that had been misled into accepting the use of torture of prisoners of war<br />
# A health care system in free fall<br />
# An educational system in free fall<br />
# A global environmental crisis of history-altering proportions (about which the Bush administration and the Republicans has done nothing)<br />
# An impasse between culture warriors from the right and left<br />
# A huge financial deficit inherited from the terminally irresponsible Bush administration.<br />
And those were only some of the problems sitting on the President&#8217;s desk!</p>
<p>&#8220;Help&#8221; from the Right?<br />
What did the Republicans and the religious right, libertarians and half-baked conspiracy theorists &#8212; that is what the Republicans were reduced to by the time Obama took office &#8212; do to &#8220;help&#8221; our new president (and our country) succeed?  They claimed that he wasn&#8217;t a real American, didn&#8217;t have an American birth certificate, wasn&#8217;t born here, was secretly a Muslim, was white-hating &#8220;racist&#8221;, was secretly a communist, was actually the Anti-Christ, (!) and was a reincarnation of Hitler and wanted &#8220;death panels&#8221; to kill the elderly!  They not-so-subtly called for his assassination through the not-so-subtle use of vile signs held at their rallies and even a bumper sticker quoting Psalm 109:8.  They organized &#8220;tea parties&#8221; to sound off against imagined insults and all government in general and gathered to howl at the moon.  They were led by insurance industry lobbyists and deranged (but well financed) &#8220;commentators&#8221; from Glenn Beck to Rush Limbaugh.  The utterly discredited Roman Catholic bishops teamed up with the utterly discredited evangelical leaders to denounce a president who was trying to actually do something about the poor, the environment, to diminish the number of abortions through compassionate programs to help women and to care for the sick! And in Congress the Republican leadership only knew one word: &#8220;No!&#8221;  In other words the reactionary white, rube, uneducated, crazy American far right, combined with the educated but obtuse neoconservative war mongers, religious right shills for big business, libertarian Fed Reserve-hating gold bug, gun-loving crazies, child-molesting acquiescent &#8220;bishops&#8221;, frontier loons and evangelical gay-hating flakes found one thing to briefly unite them: their desire to stop an uppity black man from succeeding at all costs!</p>
<p>&#8220;Help&#8221; from the Left?<br />
What did the left do to help their newly elected president? Some of them excoriated the President because they disagreed with the bad choices he was being forced to make regarding a war in Afghanistan that he&#8217;d inherited from the worst president in modern history!  Others stood up and bravely proclaimed that the President&#8217;s economic policies had &#8220;failed&#8221; before the President even instituted them! Others said that since all gay rights battles had not been fully won within virtually minutes of the President taking office, they&#8217;d been &#8220;betrayed&#8221;! (Never mind that Obama&#8217;s vocal support to the gay community is stronger than any other president&#8217;s has been. Never mind that he signed a new hate crimes law!)  Those that had stood in transfixed legions weeping with beatific emotion on election night turned into an angry mob saying how &#8220;disappointed&#8221; they were that they&#8217;d not all immediately been translated to heaven the moment Obama stepped into the White House! Where was the &#8220;change&#8221;? Contrary to their expectations they were still mere mortals!  And the legion of young new supporters was too busy texting to pay attention for longer than a nanosecond. &#8220;Governing&#8221;?! What the hell does that word, uh, like mean?&#8221;<br />
The President&#8217;s critics left and right all had one thing in common: impatience laced with little-to-no sense of history (let alone reality) thrown in for good measure. Then of course there were the white, snide know-it- all commentators/talking heads who just couldn&#8217;t imagine that maybe, just maybe they weren&#8217;t as smart as they thought they were and certainly not as smart as their president. He hadn&#8217;t consulted them, had he? So he must be wrong!  The Obama critics&#8217; ideological ideas defined their idea of reality rather than reality defining their ideas-say, about what is possible in one year in office after the hand that the President had been dealt by fate, or to be exact by the American idiot nation that voted Bush into office. Twice! </p>
<p>Meanwhile back in the reality-based community &#8211; in just 12 short months &#8212; President Obama:<br />
#Continued to draw down the misbegotten war in Iraq &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Thoughtfully and decisively picked the best of several bad choices regarding the war in Afghanistan &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Gave a major precedent-setting speech supporting gay rights &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Restored America &#8216;s image around the globe &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Banned torture of American prisoners &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Stopped the free fall of the American economy &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Put the USA squarely back in the bilateral international community &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Put the USA squarely into the middle of the international effort to halt global warming<br />
(But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Stood up for educational reform &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Won a Nobel peace prize &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Moved the trial of terrorists back into the American judicial system of checks and balances &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Did what had to be done to start the slow, torturous and almost impossible process of health care reform that 7 presidents had failed to even begin &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Responded to hatred from the right and left with measured good humor and patience<br />
(But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Stopped the free fall of job losses &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Showed immense personal courage in the face of an armed and dangerous far right opposition that included the sort of disgusting people that show up at public meetings carrying loaded weapons and carrying Timothy McVeigh-inspired signs about the &#8220;blood of tyrants&#8221; needing to &#8220;water the tree of liberty&#8221;. &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)<br />
#Showed that he could not only make the tough military choices but explain and defend them brilliantly &#8211; (But that wasn&#8217;t good enough for his critics)</p>
<p>Other than those &#8220;disappointing&#8221; accomplishments &#8212; IN ONE YEAR &#8212; President Obama &#8220;failed&#8221;! Other than that he didn&#8217;t &#8220;live up to expectations&#8221;!</p>
<p>Who actually has failed&#8230; &#8230;are the Americans that can&#8217;t see the beginning of a miracle of national rebirth right under their jaded noses. Who failed are the smart ass ideologues of the left and right who began rooting for this President to fail so that they could be proved right in their dire and morbid predictions. Who failed are the movers and shakers behind our obscenely dumb news cycles that have turned &#8220;news&#8221; into just more stupid entertainment for an entertainment-besotted infantile country.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the good news: President Obama is succeeding without the help of his lefty &#8220;supporters&#8221; or hate-filled Republican detractors!<br />
The Future Looks Good!</p>
<p>After Obama has served two full terms, (and he will), after his wisdom in moving deliberately and cautiously with great subtlety on all fronts &#8212; with a canny and calculating eye to the possible succeeds, (it will), after the economy is booming and new industries are burgeoning, (they will be), after the doomsayers are all proved not just wrong but silly: let the record show that not all Americans were panicked into thinking the sky was/is falling!!!!!<br />
Just because we didn&#8217;t get everything we wanted in the first short and fraught year Obama was in office not all of us gave up. Some of us stayed the course. And we will be proved right.<br />
(By Frank Schaefer)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/obama-will-triumph-so-will-america-by-frank-schaefer-ny-times/2011/09/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dysfunctional Misfits</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/dysfunctional-misfits/2011/08/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/dysfunctional-misfits/2011/08/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official! The government of the greatest country in the world &#8211; the supposedly &#8220;world leader&#8221; &#8211; is a bunch of dysfunctional misfits. Over the last few days I have had countless conversations with people of all walks of life and everyone is mad as hell that the AAA credit rating of this country has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official!  The government of the greatest country in the world &#8211; the supposedly &#8220;<em>world leader</em>&#8221; &#8211; is a bunch of <strong>dysfunctional misfits</strong>.  Over the last few days I have had countless conversations with people of all walks of life and everyone is mad as hell that the AAA credit rating of this country has been downgraded for the first time in history.  Many expressed anger over the rating agency (S&#038;P) but in reality, we should be angry at Congress, and specifically at the House of Representatives (<em>although they proved they only stand to represent themselves, certainly not the citizens of our great Nation and not the best interests of this country</em>).  The petty battle over raising the debt ceiling went on and on &#8211; despite repeated warnings that failure to act in a timely manner could result in lowering of the credit rating.  It obviously fell on deaf ears &#8211; or did it?  Regardless of which side of the aisle you support, you have to be realistic enough to consider the fact that this could have been intentional.  At no time in history has a debate over raising the debt ceiling lasted so long and created so much attention.  Under <strong>President Reagan &#8211; 18 times </strong>during his 8 years in office!!  Under <strong>President Bush &#8211; 10 times</strong>!  Yet, unless you are a true follower of politics, most people never even knew about it.  Now, under <strong>President Obama</strong>, the very first time he requested a raise in the debt ceiling, it resulted in a drawn-out battle and a loss of our credit rating.  It will affect each of us in some way &#8211; this you can be sure of.  Americans should be outraged by this!  A recent poll says that the overwhelming majority of voters surveyed said that incumbent members of Congress should not be reelected.  Yet, 56% say their own representative DESERVES reelection.  Duh!  Are we that dumb?  We can only effect change by voting against the members of your own districts.  We don&#8217;t have the luxury of voting across the board for other representatives.  That is precisely what these clowns were banking on.  Most of them believe they are popular enough in their own districts that they will be looked upon favorably regardless of what they did and the blame would be on &#8220;everyone else&#8221;.  Americans have got to be smarter than this.  Are we that set on our own party and our own representatives that we will accept anything they do &#8211; even when it is clearly wrong?  I have been a Democrat for life but I have, on occasions, voted for a Republican.  Granted, it has been rare but I have done it in instances when I was clearly convinced that person was a better candidate and had a better message.  Right now, our politicians have become downright nasty and the U.S. must be viewed as a big joke around the world.  The country that was once the most respected in the world has now lost more than a AAA credit rating &#8211; it has lost respect and admiration among other world leaders and citizens of other countries &#8211; and deservingly so.  There is no one in this country more loyal than I &#8211; and I am a proud American until the day I die.  Yet, I am ashamed at how our elected officials have behaved the past two years.  They are supposed to be the best and brightest America has to offer?  There are college students who are more mature and can make more responsible decisions than many of these so-called leaders.  Forget about President Obama&#8217;s race (<em>although it is an issue and you&#8217;re down-right naive or dumb if you don&#8217;t think so</em>) &#8211; the fact remain, he has not been given a legitimate chance to lead because he has faced great opposition on everything he has done &#8211; or tried to do.  Former President Bush got far more support than our current president and the reality is, he was one of the worst presidents in our history (<em>not &#8220;the&#8221; worst but he ranks up there</em>).  This is far beyond partisan politics &#8211; this is just ugly and nasty.  I am appalled at how low our leaders have stooped.  We should all know now &#8211; the welfare and well-being of this country and its citizens is secondary to politics.  The Republican-controlled House allowed their desire to make the president look bad and their ambition for more power to cloud their better judgment (<em>if they even have any</em>).  You don&#8217;t have to like the President, but every member of Congress is obligated to do the right thing for our country.  The current members of the House did <strong>not</strong> do that &#8211; and that&#8217;s why we are in this mess.  We can only hope that all Americans have a long memory &#8211; to November 2012 &#8211; and that Americans as a whole would exercise better judgment than the leaders they elected in 2010.<br />
That&#8217;s <strong>MY SIDE</strong>!  I welcome your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/dysfunctional-misfits/2011/08/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Side and Mine (Eva Longoria for President!)</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/your-side-and-mine-eva-longoria-for-president/2011/07/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/your-side-and-mine-eva-longoria-for-president/2011/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For whatever reason, some readers still prefer to REPLY to emails directly to me rather than posting comments on the MY SIDE website. Quite frankly, I do not mind &#8211; as long as MY SIDE continues to generate conversation and promote thinking. I welcome your feedback regardless of how you send it. On the downside, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For whatever reason, some readers still prefer to REPLY to emails directly to me rather than posting comments on the <strong>MY SIDE </strong>website.  Quite frankly, I do not mind &#8211; as long as MY SIDE continues to generate conversation and promote thinking. I welcome your feedback regardless of how you send it.  On the downside, I do not always post every comment/email I receive but I do make an attempt to respond to most.  Over the past couple of weeks, a number of emails have come in as my last two commentaries generated a lot of talk.  Below are a few of those comments (some with minor edits for clarity).</p>
<p><strong>From H.S. &#8211; Washington, DC</strong>:  I am at a loss for words regarding the behavior of Congress and specifically the Republicans in the House.  I &#8216;am&#8217; a registered Republican but I must admit that I am embarrassed that my elected leaders are playing games with America&#8217;s financial standing.  At one point, I thought it was just a matter of differences in opinion (which you pointed out is President Obama&#8217;s view).  However, as this stalemate has drawn out and it&#8217;s getting closer and closer to the deadline for action, I am more convinced that Republicans are determined to not negotiate with this President and they truly want to embarrass him regardless of the consequences to the country.  While I hate to agree with you, I now believe this is racially motivated and as you said, I do not believe Congress (regardless of which party is in control) would be still stalling over raising the debt ceiling if any other person (other than a Black man) was President.  I am a proud card-carrying Republican but right now, I am ashamed of the actions of my party and how petty they have become.</p>
<p><strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  I can only imagine how difficult it must have been for you to pen those words.  I respect you for seeing more than one side.  Far too often we are too deeply rooted in our own US versus THEM mentality that we refuse to see or believe anything contrary to what our base believes.  Thanks for sharing.</p>
<p><strong>L.E. from Montgomery County, MD</strong>: Based on my income level, I am one of those people that President Obama wants to raise taxes on so I am strongly opposed to his plan for balancing the budget.  There has to be another way to do it than placing more tax burden on those of us that have worked hard to reach the level where we are in the top 5% of the wage earners.  It seems that the President wants to punish people like me for being successful.</p>
<p><strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  I strongly disagree.  While my household is also in that top 5% and our taxes will go up, I do not base my support for a proposal solely on how it affects me personally.  I tend to look at the bigger picture and how it affects the country.  President Obama is also in that category &#8211; so are most of the members of Congress.  Based on the problems facing our Nation, there must be some hard choices and some sacrifices.  I cannot, in good conscious, expect people in low income brackets to pay more; nor would I expect to start cutting valuable benefits that so many senior citizens depend on just to survive.  From whom much is given, much is expected.  It&#8217;s not punishment &#8211; it&#8217;s a way to do your part in ensuring the long term health of our country&#8217;s financial system.  </p>
<p><strong>M.J. from East Orange, NJ</strong>:  If I recall from some earlier messages you posted, you are not a fan of <strong>Sarah Palin</strong>.  Why?  She is very outgoing, articulate, good-looking, and she is down-to-earth and would make a good President &#8211; someone that would really be &#8220;for the people&#8221;.</p>
<p><strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  I am not sure whether to take your email seriously or if you are only teasing.  Either way, I will respond as if you are serious.  For starters, if you do believe what you wrote, you are a certifiably dangerous person.  I am outgoing, articulate, good-looking, and down-to-earth (okay &#8211; that part may be a stretch but&#8230;) and yet, I don&#8217;t see anyone touting me for President of the United States.  Sarah Palin is a good American.  She loves her country and I truly believe she is sincere.  The problem is, she&#8217;s an unqualified idiot.  She couldn&#8217;t handle the pressure of running the state of Alaska so she resigned in mid-term &#8211; yet I am supposed to trust her to run the country?  When things get hot, what will she do &#8211; quit?  I cannot even begin to imagine her having to face the many pressures and issues that President Obama has had to deal with the past 2 years.  Sarah, in my opinion, would have wilted under pressure long ago.  There was an article in the USATODAY a couple of weeks ago based solely on Sarah Palin.  While I don&#8217;t recall everything about the article, I do remember that it was not very flattering about her or her avid supporters.  The article talked about how her supporters feeds feverish responses on one side and embarrassing overreaction on the other.  In a nutshell, the article suggested that Sarah&#8217;s popularity is based more on her good looks than anything else.  Seriously?!?  Well bring on <strong>Eva Longoria, J&#8217;Lo, Cameron Diaz, and Halle Berry </strong>- take your pick!  Either one would make a great President if looks are what matters.  Eva has my vote.  I volunteer to be her campaign manager &#8211; for free &#8211; (<em>only kidding Li &#8211; wink wink</em>). Anyway &#8211; back to Sarah (what a drop-off) &#8211; she is okay as long as she doesn&#8217;t open her mouth.  She is not very well-informed and certainly not very intelligent (<em>and quite frankly, I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;s that good-looking either</em>).  Please tell me why she should be President.  Let&#8217;s all snap back to reality and focus our attention to legitimate candidates.  After all the smoke dies down, Sarah Palin will be reduced to just another temporary distraction.  </p>
<p><strong>A.D. from Canton, OH</strong>:  I read your comments regarding smokers with interest.  I am a smoker and I do not consider myself as rude and inconsiderate.  I never smoke inside restaurants or in crowds even outside.  When I am out with friends, some of whom do not smoke, I walk far away from them when I feel the urge to light up.  In short, not all smokers are as inconsiderate as the person you described.  As for the health issue, I am aware that I will probably get cancer and die.  Yet, my attitude is that no one lives forever and smoking is something I enjoy so I accept the risks.</p>
<p><strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  Wow!  I am almost speechless.  Rarely do you meet someone that cares so little about life that they openly admit that they accept the risks of death.  It&#8217;s sad that life has dealt you such a blow that you feel you have nothing worth living for.  I can only assume (and hope) that you don&#8217;t have a spouse and children.  At any rate, thank you for being considerate and not trying to take others with you to your death chamber.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/your-side-and-mine-eva-longoria-for-president/2011/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truth, Justice, and the American Way</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/truth-justice-and-the-american-way/2011/07/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/truth-justice-and-the-american-way/2011/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casey Anthony – NOT GUILTY – so says 12 jurors in Orlando after just 11 hours of deliberation! Not since the O.J. Simpson murder trial have we seen such a ridiculous verdict. For those who are uninformed, Casey Anthony is a 25-year old woman, pretty, with a love for partying. She was the mother of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Casey Anthony </strong>– NOT GUILTY – so says 12 jurors in Orlando after just 11 hours of deliberation!  Not since the <strong>O.J. Simpson </strong>murder trial have we seen such a ridiculous verdict.  For those who are uninformed, Casey Anthony is a 25-year old woman, pretty, with a love for partying.  She was the mother of 2-year old <strong>Caylee Anthony </strong>who was found dead after being missing for a few months.  All evidence pointed to the mother’s involvement in the death of the child.  Yet, she was convicted only of lying to investigators.  Why would she lie to investigators about her daughter’s disappearance and death if she truly had nothing to do with either?  Why would a mother make up a story about her child being kidnapped by a non-existent nanny – and then wait for over a month to report it?  Then there is the borrowed shovel; the bad odor emitting from the trunk of her car (<em>which her lawyers say was from spoiled food left in the car</em>) – seriously – why would she leave food in the trunk?  At any rate, in this writer’s opinion, Casey Anthony is as guilty of murdering her daughter as O.J. Simpson was of murdering his ex-wife.  Yes &#8211; according the court and a juror of their peers, both were found “not guilty”.  That means nothing.  We all know that being found not guilty in court does not necessarily mean “innocent”.  It’s quite amazing though: <em>we send a football player to jail for 2 years for involvement in dog-fighting; we send another football player to jail for nearly two years for shooting himself in the leg; we spend tons of money going after Barry Bonds to prove he used steroids so he could be kept out of the hall of fame;</em> but this young, pretty little girl gets off free on the charge of murdering her daughter.  Where is the justice here?  </p>
<p>We seriously have our priorities screwed up.  This writer does <strong>not</strong>, in any shape, form or fashion, promote or agree with illegal drug use – and that includes steroids.  However, illegal drug users are harming and damaging their own bodies and adversely affecting their own health.  Eventually, they may be successful in killing themselves.  Yet, it’s their own choice so sending people to jail for harming themselves is a waste of taxpayer money.  We need to focus on the real criminals – those that are potential threats to society.  </p>
<p>While on this subject of self-harm, you have to be amused at the new warnings on cigarette packets that will show up next year.  They are very graphic and send a clear message that smoking kills.  Does anyone truly believe this will suddenly make a difference?  Smokers already know that tobacco kills!  The warnings have been out there for many years – and the real evidence is the high number of family members, friends, co-workers who have cancer and many who have died as a result of it – all from smoking tobacco.  Yet, many continue to do it because they think it will never happen to them (or maybe they just don’t care).  For those that don’t care, they should just find a quicker end to life and get it over with.  Why make your friends and family suffer too?  For this writer, it’s a very sensitive subject because of the many people near and dear to me that has passed on – too early &#8211; as a result of smoking; and the many that remain who continue to smoke &#8211; just ignoring the dangers.  The idea of “it’s too hard to quit” is a bunch of shigidy!  Life is hard – but we do the things that are important to us.  Li and I went out to see the fireworks on the 4th – in Fairfax.  We had a reserved table in a nice spot; had drinks, dinner, and a perfect view of the fireworks.  Four other guests went with us plus our twins.  Then, unexpectedly, some selfish, inconsiderate excuse for a human lit up a cigarette at the table next to us – exposing our children (and others) to second-hand smoke.  Despite our comments and nasty stares, he continued to puff on it and repeated the same a few other times during the course of the night.  It would have been easy him to get up from his table and walk a few steps away to smoke (as the majority of the smokers in the crowd did) but he chose to sit there – obviously hoping to slowly kill others as he is killing himself.  Many others around us shared our thought process of wanting to turn a hose on him and douse him completely.  Yet, we refrained – choosing to exercise more class and humanity than he did.  After all, stooping to his level would have made us no better than him – which is the prevailing attitude when encountering ignorant people.  Moreover, the American Way is that you must respect the rights of others to do as they choose regardless of how offensive it is.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s MY SIDE.  Thanks for reading and sharing.  Comments welcomed!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/truth-justice-and-the-american-way/2011/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stupid is as Stupid Does</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/2011/07/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/2011/07/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American politicians and specifically, Congress have sunk to a new low. America is facing a number of significant crisis, some with the potential for long-term negative implications. Yet, Congress is playing political games in an attempt to embarrass the President. Of course they would never “say” that’s the reason but pay attention to the facts. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American politicians and specifically, Congress have sunk to a new low.  America is facing a number of significant crisis, some with the potential for long-term negative implications.  Yet, Congress is playing political games in an attempt to embarrass the President.  Of course they would never “<em>say</em>” that’s the reason but pay attention to the facts.  Never in the history of our great Nation has any President had to deal with as much negativity and opposition in Congress as <strong>President Obama </strong>– and that includes Richard Nixon and George W. Bush.  As a major critic of <strong>President George W. Bush</strong>, this writer has looked closely at his overall presidency.  While conceding that President Bush was a “good person” with good intentions (<em>except for the war in Iraq</em>), he was not a very good President.  Specifically, he was very bad when it came to the economy.  When he took office in January 2001, the federal budget was on a more promising course than any President had inherited in decades. The budget had run surpluses for three straight fiscal years under<strong> President Clinton</strong>.  This is even more impressive when you consider the fact that prior to that 3-year “surplus” run under President Clinton, the budget had been running deficits for nearly consecutive 30 years. Also, of note, President Bush’s own Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that if the policies in place when President Bush took office remained unchanged, the budget would generate surpluses that would total $5.6 trillion over the next ten years.  That would have been more than enough to pay off the entire outstanding federal debt held by the public.  However, as we all know, this did not happen.  President Bush and Congresses changed those policies sharply Consequently, those large projected surpluses turned to large deficits.  During eight years under President Bush, the large ($3.5 trillion) surplus turned into a $2 trillion deficit.  James Horney and Robert Greenstein, writing for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, did a very detailed comparison of the Bush policies vs the Obama policies and their effect on the national deficit.  In short, they concluded that President Obama’s policies will have a significantly smaller impact on increasing the deficit than those of President Bush – despite what his opponents would have you to believe.</p>
<p>Let’s be clear.  This commentary is <strong>NOT</strong> about defending President Obama or his policies; far from it.  Rather, it’s about Congress behaving badly and refusing to support this President even at the expense of the American people and at the risk of America’s financial standing in the world.  They (Congress) have refused to negotiate on the federal budget.  We all remember the repeated interim spending measures (Continuing Resolutions) at the beginning of this fiscal year just to keep the Government running and they finally passed a bill with only a few months left in the fiscal year.  Now instead of immediately turning their attention to a new budget for the fiscal year that begins October 1st, Congress is busy using stall tactics, negative talk, and finger-pointing.  However, despite all of this, the most pressing issue is that of raising the debt ceiling.  Failure to act before the end of July will result in the United States defaulting on its debt.  This will create a major financial disaster for this country and cost all of us dearly.  Under no circumstances should we be in this position this late in the game.  Congress should have acted on this long ago and not keep threatening to allow a default.  They think this will truly embarrass the President (<em>since the U.S. has never defaulted on its debt</em>) and would surely mean he will not get re-elected.  This is particularly true if they stall long enough where the financial markets get nervous and start reacting negatively, even if Congress ultimately passes a last-minute deal to avoid actual default.  They know (or at least hope) the political damage would have been done.  It is unbelievable how politicians continue to make decisions (or lack thereof) based on elections or their own personal/political careers.  We place them in office to work together and make the hard decisions that are in the best interests of the country – not those in the best interests of select groups or parties.  One has to wonder:  if the exact same circumstances existed under President Bush (or any other President), would Congress be playing this stall game or would they have already made the right decision to raise the debt ceiling?  Really – do we have to wonder about this?<br />
Another example was the recent vote in the House regarding America’s involvement in the crisis in Libya.  Again, this was just another attempt to embarrass this President.  President Bush had us invade Iraq under false pretenses (after insisting there were weapons of mass destruction).  Yet, Congress supported him and after all this time, we are still trying to recover from that long war in Iraq and the war in Afghanistan.  Regardless of why we went to war, the reality is, we (as Americans) support the effort, finish the mission, and get our troops out.  Instead, Congress is repeatedly trying to strip more “power” from this President.  One writer worded it best when he suggested: <em>“Congress is sending a clear message that this is too much power for a Black man to have and they need to control him at all costs”</em>.  While it sounds a little funny on one hand and too harsh on the other, yet, there is a measure of truth in it.  We can “say” all we want about how the country has moved forward in the area of race relations, but when you look closely at the wide range of things this President has had to face, you cannot help but conclude that racism is a factor in some actions by Congress, many actions and remarks by Americans as a whole, and in the repeated acts of disrespect by some in the media (such as the name calling that continues to make headlines).  This is, without question, the nastiest this country has been in recent memory.  Although President Obama suggests it is just about Americans and the different parties expressing differences in opinions, we all know he is just being politically correct.  He would love to “believe” that&#8217;s all it is but even the President knows it’s deeper than that.  Americans have always disagreed on politics but without the degree of ugliness that we see now.  We should be banding together to solve the debt crisis, improve the economy, tackle health care, ensure a smooth transition from involvement in Afghanistan, and resolution of the many other issues facing our Nation.  But instead, we are bogged down in petty politics and racial hatred.  Some are directly involved in this mess; some promote it; some refuse to admit that it’s true; and some are just plain blind to it.  Others live it every day and can see clearly.  For this writer, in an interracial marriage and the father of bi-racial twins, racism is obvious every day – and never more evident than having to face it from those supposedly close to you:  family!!  It goes to prove, that ignorance exists not only on Capitol Hill, but also in the homes, hearts, and heads of people we know up close and personal.  </p>
<p><strong>Martin Luther King</strong>’s dream, no matter how much progress we’ve made during the past 40+ years, has not yet been realized.  We keep getting close but the every time we think we are about to reach the mountaintop, someone adds another rock.  But we keep on climbing, keep on believing, that the day will come when ignorance and stupidity will be overcome.  Keep hope alive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/stupid-is-as-stupid-does/2011/07/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s Talk Sports</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/lets-talk-sports/2011/05/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/lets-talk-sports/2011/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 09:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LA Lakers recently hired former Cleveland coach (Mike Brown) to replace Phil Jackson. It’s hard to believe the criticism of this hire. Mike Brown won 272 games (against only 138 losses). There are only a handful of coaches with a record this impressive in the NBA. Reports are that Kobe Bryant is upset over the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LA Lakers </strong>recently hired former Cleveland coach (<em>Mike Brown</em>) to replace Phil Jackson.  It’s hard to believe the criticism of this hire.  Mike Brown won 272 games (<em>against only 138 losses</em>).  There are only a handful of coaches with a record this impressive in the NBA.  Reports are that <strong>Kobe Bryant </strong>is upset over the hire because he wanted someone else to get the job and he was not consulted on the hire.  Excuse me?  Kobe is an employee of the Lakers!  He is paid <strong>$25 million </strong>a year to PLAY basketball.  He is not an owner and he is not entitled to make hiring decisions just because he is the team’s star player.  What about the rest of the players on the team?  They weren’t consulted either.  Kobe is the biggest “diva” in the NBA and he whines and complains more than anyone.  He could very well sulk and just go through the motions next season just to see Mike Brown fail.  Should that happen, Jerry Buss (team owner) should be getting rid of Kobe and not the coach.  Kobe has done much for the franchise and he is a great player (<em>although an accused rapist and with an obvious hatred and disrespect towards gays</em>), but he has (at best) three more years to play.  It’s time for the team to look to the future.  But more importantly, the team had every right to make the hiring decision based on who they thought was best for the team – and Kobe’s input is not required.  With the hiring of Mike Brown as coach, I have become a fan of the Lakers again (but not of Kobe).</p>
<p>Everyone selected <strong>Boston and Chicago </strong>to play for the Eastern Conference Championship in the NBA.  <strong>The Miami Heat </strong>has now played and beaten both of those teams; and in the case of Miami versus Chicago, the Heat lost the first game in Chicago then won 4 in a row (2 of them in Chicago).  Chicago had the NBA’s Player of the Year (Derrick Rose), the coach of the year, and the best record in basketball – but it was not enough against Miami’s big 3.  <strong>Lebron James </strong>proved that he IS the NBA’s “best player” (regardless of who the sports writers gave the award to this year).  Now, the NBA finals are set:  Miami versus Dallas – a repeat of the 2006 finals in which Miami won.  Dallas is pumped and primed to give Miami a beat-down in pay back for that 2006 loss.  It will make for a great story line and good theater.  However, expect to see Miami cutting down the nets after 6 games.  Take that all the “haters”.</p>
<p>I’ve gone on record before as not a big fan of hockey.  However, I “am” a fan of the Washington Capitals.  For three years in a row, they have entered the playoffs with the best record and now, for three years in a row, they have made an early exit from the playoffs (failing to advance past the 2d round).  Seriously, it’s getting harder for me to care.  Maybe next season they should barely make the playoffs (get in as the 8th seed) and maybe then they can play spoiler and make it through to the finals.  I am an avid sports fan but I admit I don’t know a lot about hockey.  However, it’s hard to understand how a team can be consistently great during the regular season and crash and burn in the playoffs every year.  In the NBA, it gets coaches fired (see Mike Brown’s resume…).  Still, I believe the bigger responsibility in the playoffs (for any sport) rests with the players stepping up and making plays.  Hockey is no different.   It’s time for the Capital’s Alexander the “great” to play great in the playoffs – next year.</p>
<p>There is a very real possibility that the NFL season may not happen this year.  Professional football is my absolute favorite sport.  I cannot imagine a season without football.  However, I am firmly behind the “owners” on this one and I don’t think they should cave in.  NFL players are overpaid as it is and they have the nerve to demand a greater share of the revenue!  Really!  The owners ‘own’ the teams and they make all the investments and pay the bills.  The players invest nothing!  They just show up to play and collect huge paychecks – and many of them don’t play very inspired.  Look at <strong>Albert Haynesworth </strong>– the Washington Redskins’ $100 million man who played very little the past two years and contributed absolutely nothing of significance.  This is an extreme case but there are plenty of players who show up to collect a check without contributing much.  They know they are under contract so they are safe and their motivation is not that great.  In short, let them all sit out a year with no pay.  It won’t affect some but there are a large number of players who actually need the paychecks.  Maybe they should get rid of that sham of a Director of the Player’s Association (<strong>DeMaurice Smith</strong>) who walks around with an arrogant attitude like he is the big man on campus.  He needs a big slice of humble pie and I hope the courts and the owners feed it to him.</p>
<p>That’s MY SIDE. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/lets-talk-sports/2011/05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love Gone Sour</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/love-gone-sour/2011/05/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/love-gone-sour/2011/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 09:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It continues to amaze me how Americans get so wrapped up in other people’s marriages and more specifically, divorces. When it comes to celebrity divorces, everyone has an opinion. The recent news about Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver’s decision to separate has headlined the news for two days. Really? Is this so important? We have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It continues to amaze me how Americans get so wrapped up in other people’s marriages and more specifically, divorces.  When it comes to celebrity divorces, everyone has an opinion.  The recent news about <strong>Arnold Schwarzenegger and Maria Shriver’s </strong>decision to separate has headlined the news for two days.  Really?  Is this so important?  We have troops deployed in danger zones, economic woes, the crisis in Libya, and I could go on and on…yet, the big news is concerning a celebrity divorce.  I really don’t get it.  Why do people care?  Quite frankly, I could not care any less about Arnold and Maria’s marriage.  He fathered a child by another woman 10 years ago and NOW, they are divorcing over it.  Sure, whatever!  The reality is that when a couple has been married for 25 years (<em>as they have</em>), and then decide to divorce, there are a lot more issues than the ones that are made public.  Further, it also suggests that the problems in the marriage have been ongoing for a lot longer than just two days ago when the news broke.  I would suggest the past 5 or more years have been rocky and they stayed together for appearances – and maybe the children – but I will venture to say that the relationship has been dead for a while.  Folks also got all excited about the <strong>Morgan Freeman’s </strong>divorce from his wife of 24 years; <strong>Hulk Hogan’s </strong>divorce after 24 years; <strong>Michael Douglas’ </strong>divorce after 23 years (and he re-married a few months later to Catherine-Zeta Jones).  Let’s not forget how angry everyone was over <strong>Michael Jordan </strong>and Juanita splitting up after 17 years – and even <strong>Tiger Woods </strong>(after only 5 years) and <strong>Shaq</strong> (after 5 years).  Seriously!  No marriage goes sour over-night.  It is a process and the end comes after years of going through the motions but with no real spark or hope for improvement.  I am a big advocate of marriage and I believe couples ought to do everything possible to try to salvage their marriage provided they still have feelings for each other and believe there is a realistic chance for real progress.  You work through the good and the bad – as long as you are supportive of one another.  However, I do NOT advocate couples staying together just for the sake of appearances, the children, money, or just because they have been together all these years so why not just stay together.  No-No-No!  Life is short as it is and I do not encourage people to spend what time they have on this earth trapped in a bad marriage and an unhappy home situation.  It’s not worth it.  So you end up dividing assets but really, whatever you lose in material things – you gain in happiness and peace of mind.  <strong>Money cannot buy that</strong>!  In short, we should applaud folks like Arnold and Maria that make the very difficult decision to move away from a miserable marriage and start fresh.  For the rest of the world, instead of shaking your head and criticizing, perhaps you should wish them both well.  You don’t know the “rest of the story” that remains hidden between the walls of the home they shared together.</p>
<p>That’s <strong>MY SIDE</strong>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/love-gone-sour/2011/05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proud to be an American</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/proud-to-be-an-american/2011/05/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/proud-to-be-an-american/2011/05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 23:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most Americans, I am extremely proud today of my country and our Armed Forces. After nearly ten years, the mastermind of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on American soil is dead. Osama bin Laden was shot and killed by American Forces in a well orchestrated raid on his hideout in Pakistan on Sunday, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like most Americans, I am extremely proud today of my country and our Armed Forces.  After nearly ten years, the mastermind of the <strong>September 11, 2001 </strong>terrorist attacks on American soil is dead.  <strong>Osama bin Laden</strong> was shot and killed by American Forces in a well orchestrated raid on his hideout in Pakistan on Sunday, May 1, 2011.  The announcement of bin Laden&#8217;s death by <strong>President Obama</strong> sparked celebratory outbreaks throughout the Washington, DC area as thousands converged on the White House lawn to cheer the news.  While some say it is wrong to celebrate the death of another human being, this is truly an exception.  For the holier-than-thou folks who will criticize those of us for celebrating and cheering, allow me to be very personal for the remainder of this commentary.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, September 11, 2001 I was scheduled to attend a meeting at the Pentagon.  However, I had a rough evening breathing as I had an upper respiratory infection so on the morning of 9-11-2011, I stopped off at the hospital at Fort Belvoir, VA to receive a breathing treatment and other medications to treat my illness.  While I was there, my physician came in and told me the Pentagon had just been hit.  My heart sank.  If there was ever a time to be thankful for being sick, this was it.  Yet, I could not feel good about the news that many military service members and civilians had lost their lives in this horrific attack on America.  184 people died that day at the Pentagon.  Included among those were some people whom I knew very well, served with, and respected.  One was Lieutenant General <strong>Tim Maude</strong>.  As my Battalion Commander when we was just a Lieutenant Colonel, Tim Maude personally endorsed my direct commission as a Second Lieutenant (<em>I was one of only 2000 Army personnel to serve in a dual component status</em>).  I then served with him again in Germany (before he made his 3d star).  Sergeant Major <strong>Lacey B. Ivory </strong>was a personal friend and fellow Sergeant Major.  He lived just upstairs from me in Heidleberg Germany and we knew each other well.  His wife (Deborah) was also a great friend and a distinguished Army officer.  When I was trying to leave Fort Lewis, Washington to come to the DC area, Lacey was already at the Pentagon and he knew of another position there and tried to talk to me into taking it.  As much as I would have loved to serve alongside Lacey again, I was not interested in the Pentagon at that time so I instead accepted an assignment at the Department of Army Headquarters.  Sergeant Major <strong>Larry Strickland</strong> was another comrade of mine.  He was retiring in less than a month and his wife (Debra) was on active duty serving at Fort Belvoir.  These three distinguished gentlemen had given so much to the military and to this country.  When they went to work that Tuesday morning, they all had busy agendas and much to do.  At no time did either of them consider that this would be their last day.  They, like the other 181 people who died at the Pentagon that day, were doing their jobs.  And in no time at all, with no warning, their lives were taken away because of Osama bin Laden.  They made the ultimate sacrifice but they did not deserve to die.  We were not at war.  All total, there were 2977 people who lost their lives as a direct result of this attack on 9-11-01.  During the ensuring War of Terror (<em>initiated by then President George W. Bush</em>), 4,454 American service members died in Iraq and another 1,566 U.S. personnel died in Afghanistan.  In addition, there were thousands of wounded service members (<em>well over 6,000</em>).  When you consider all of these numbers, you cannot help but see the magnitude of the destruction that bin Laden&#8217;s actions caused.  In addition to the dead and wounded, there are also the parents, children, siblings, friends and loved ones who continue to struggle with the loss of someone so near and dear to them.  By the grace of God, my life was spared that day as a result of an illness.  I don&#8217;t question why, I am just thankful everyday.  Now, when I look at the faces of my two-week old twins, I think of how their lives would have never come to be had I gone to my meeting that day.  </p>
<p>Therefore, I am not sad with the death of Osama bin Laden.  He was an evil terrorist who got what he deserved.  It was long overdue.  While it does not bring back Tim, Lacey, Larry, or any of the others who lost their lives, it is a small measure of satisfaction for the survivors and for Americans as a whole who have had our lives changed forever as a result of that day.  My son (Ray Jr) was 25 years old on 9-11-2001.  However, what should have been a great celebration turned into a day of sadness for him and all Americans.  Maybe this year &#8211; <em>on 9-11-2011</em> &#8211; he will celebrate his birthday like never before.  Maybe today, the survivors of all the 9-11 victims and the families of the service members who lost their lives fighting the war on terror will breath a sigh of relief and feel a small bit of their burden lifted.</p>
<p>Lastly, kudos to our American forces who pulled off this mission, to Leon Panetta (CIA Director), and to our President, Barack Obama.  We are all proud of their efforts and together, we celebrate this success.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s MY SIDE!  Thanks for reading and sharing.<br />
&#8212;Doc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/proud-to-be-an-american/2011/05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adults Behaving Badly / Want a MY SIDE – Here’s a SIDE for You!</title>
		<link>http://doc-myside.com/adults-behaving-badly-want-a-my-side-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-a-side-for-you/2011/04/</link>
		<comments>http://doc-myside.com/adults-behaving-badly-want-a-my-side-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-a-side-for-you/2011/04/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 22:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A. Ray Everette</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Previous Commentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://doc-myside.com/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking some time off from writing MY SIDE has not been kind. Here are some blasts from readers: Reader: With all the important stuff going on, you have been eerily silent. Are you on vacation or just avoiding the issues? What do you think of the Government shut-down? (S.G. – Dumfries, VA) MY SIDE: Trust [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking some time off from writing <strong>MY SIDE </strong>has not been kind.  Here are some blasts from readers:</p>
<p><strong>Reader</strong>:  With all the important stuff going on, you have been eerily silent.  Are you on vacation or just avoiding the issues?  What do you think of the Government shut-down?  (<em>S.G. – Dumfries, VA</em>)<br />
<strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  Trust me, I’ve heard it all from many readers and I apologize.  It has been an extremely busy period and I chose to take some time off from <strong>MY SIDE </strong>while I focused on other things that needed my attention.  However, no excuses! Avoiding issues??  Are you serious?  I’ve never avoided an issue in my life – I thrive on issues!  As for the “potential” Government shut-down, this is one of the most “asked about” issues in recent weeks.  Let me start by saying <strong>MY SIDE </strong>does not believe there will be a shut down – and if there is, it will likely be only for the weekend – less impact – but will allow the Republican members in the House of Representatives to make their point and save face.  Let’s be clear: this ordeal is ridiculous and the real losers are the American people.  This is nothing more than partisan politics at its finest.  Both sides are holding firm to their belief and refusing to negotiate in earnest.  This is what the American people elected when they decided on a split Government back in November.  I will go on record as saying that when there is a Republican President, <strong>MY SIDE </strong>would support a Republican-controlled Congress (both Houses) and when there is a Democratic President, it should be a Democratic-controlled Congress.  This would avoid the finger-pointing and blame game and leaders would have to “get the job done” or face the consequences.  After the November elections with Republicans controlling the House and Democrats controlling the Senate, MY SIDE predicted months ago that nothing of significance would get done in Washington for the next two years.  Right now, it’s all about positioning for the big election in 2012 and no one is overly concerned about the American people.  Each of you should be mad as hell!  No matter which party you are loyal to, if you are realistic and honest with yourself, you cannot help but admit that Congress right now is a bunch of misfits – adults behaving like spoiled brats.  The Republicans led my <strong>Speaker Boehner </strong>and influenced by members of the Tea Party, actually want a shut-down.  Regardless of how it affects Government workers, pay, etc., they are more concerned about making their point and looking good in the end.  It’s a way for them to show they can “flex” their imaginary muscles and Boehner is trying to act as though he is more powerful than the President.  The size of the egos in Washington is disproportionate to their brains and hearts.  One final point:  the fiscal year spans from 1 October through 30 September – every year!  It does not change.  Therefore, members of Congress know that a budget must be approved by the start of the new fiscal year – every year.  Yet, there is always a delay in getting it done.  There is always at least one continuing resolution (CR) and sometimes several just to keep the Government operating until the budget is approved.  It is now April – and the budget for this fiscal year is not yet approved and there are only 5 months left in the fiscal year.  Seriously??  Why are we paying these folks in Congress?  What are they spending their time and efforts on – other than playing their silly, partisan games, and to be blunt, engaging in <em>“penis-measuring”</em> contests?  When it’s all said and done, all of them come off looking like they just came out of a cold shower.</p>
<p><strong>Reader</strong>:   We have a rogue Government that has been blowing smoke for decades.  We have been in the business of overthrowing Governments in order to take over their monetary systems.  Did you see that “we” are now helping Al-Qaeda to fight Qaddafi?  (<em>P.R. – Woodbridge, VA</em>)<br />
<strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  Who are the “we” that you refer to?  Please: where are you getting your information?  This is as far-fetched as anything I hear and read (and I get a lot of junk from readers).  We may not live in a perfect system – and many of our leaders leave much to be desired.  However, the idea of the U.S. working with Al-Qaeda for any reason is as ridiculous as <strong>Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama </strong>tongue- kissing in a corner of the White House.  This whole “conspiracy theory” idea is good for conversation and it gives a lot of folks reason to keep “mess” going, (<em>such as President Obama is a Muslim, President Obama was not born in the U.S., etc</em>.)  but none of it has any merit!  You can search the Internet and find a multitude of stories to supposedly support any wild theory.  However, that does not mean they are valid or even remotely correct.  The real deal is that the U.S. is “not” working with anyone to overthrow any Government (<em>okay, under President Bush, perhaps one could have been that argument when trying to oust Saddam Hussein but that was mostly personal for Bush</em>).  In the case of Libya, the U.S. is simply trying to help avoid a massacre of the Libyan citizens by a stronger and better-equipped Libyan force.  The better solution is for Qaddafi to yield to the will of the people and step down.  Nevertheless, his ouster or stepping down would NOT give the U.S. control of Libyan oil or resources.  Here is a typical Internet excerpt (from CBS News website) that people would grab and run with:  “<em>As the United States and other nations build ties with Libyan rebels and leaders of the political opposition trying to oust Libyan strongman Muammar Qaddafi, intelligence suggests al Qaeda and other terrorists have a small presence within the opposition group, a top military commander said Tuesday.  Adm. James Stavridis, the NATO Supreme Allied Commander in Europe, told Congress that officials have seen &#8220;flickers&#8221; of possible al Qaeda and Hezbollah among the rebel forces, but at this point no evidence there are significant numbers within the group&#8217;s leadership</em>”.  This equates to saying that several American citizens collaborated with Al-Qaeda to plan the 9-11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center.  Does that mean that the U.S. was working to attack its own country and its own citizens just because there were a small number of Americans involved?  </p>
<p><strong>Reader</strong>:  There are no ACC teams in the final four this year.  Who do you think will win it all?  (<em>G.L. – Newark, NJ</em>)<br />
<strong>MY SIDE</strong>:  Obviously this is now after-the-fact, but this year’s NCAA Tournament was the most exciting in years.  All number one seeds lost before reaching the final four.  Though I am not a fan of the Big Ten, I thought Ohio State was going to win it all; kudos to Kentucky (<em>although they also ousted my Tarheels in the Regional Championship game</em>).   I didn’t think Kansas or Pittsburg would make it to the final four in the beginning and in my personal bracket, I had them both losing.  I did, however, have Ohio State and Duke making it to the final four.  Either way, it was refreshing to see teams like VCU and Butler there.  However, once the dust settled and the final four was decided, I picked VCU and Kentucky to win in the semi-finals with Kentucky winning it all – wrong on both picks.  I will also say that the Championship game this year was – by far – the worst I’ve ever seen.  22-19 at halftime!  Forget the junk about defense wins championships: this was not defense – it was offensive ineptitude.  Both teams had great runs to get to the final but they stunk up the place in the championship game.  Kudos to UCONN? – I don’t think so!  Yet, they ARE the 2011 NCAA Champions!</p>
<p>That’s <strong>MY SIDE </strong>for now – more to come!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://doc-myside.com/adults-behaving-badly-want-a-my-side-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-a-side-for-you/2011/04/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: doc-myside.com @ 2012-02-22 18:00:34 -->
